|
|
Posted by Ty Ford on 06/01/07 01:10
On Thu, 31 May 2007 10:19:14 -0400, Max wrote
(in article <1180621153.972595.194570@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>):
> Richard: Lavs aren't used for those functions because they sound
> better, they're used for their convenience. Hollywood mixers will
> always boom if possible first before they reach for a lav, which
> they'll use if the environment does not permit.
> Ty: Interesting points. So you're clients were satisfied. Have you
> ever used a lower budget mic like the me66 and recived complaints from
> your clientel? Thanks.
no.
> Richard: As far as the 835b is concerned yes I'm talking from
> experience. I think i told tye before, I had a schoeps mk41, the mic
> of choice for indoors, and i compared many times both mics indoors and
> sampled them in front of all my friends on various areas, and various
> speakers in different locations, and none of them could hear the
> difference usually but when they could hear a difference they liked
> the 835b better. I can't explain why but thats what happened. Thus i
> think only strict audiophiles would hear the difference if they were
> watching your finalized product which is the vast minority. So yes i
> think that is something to brag about when the schoeps mk41(and
> optional cut filter) is more then one grand, and the 835 is i think
> around 250 or so.
Without me being there to see how the test took place, no deal.
Look, bottom line. You want to love the 835b or me66, fine, do it.
It's not like it's just us three. Pretty much the entire film sound cadre of
audio guys like the cmc641, or maybe an MKH 60 or CS33.
That's a LOT of people with good ears. You don't have enough urine in you to
piss in all of those wells.
Regards,
Ty Ford
--Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services
Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com
Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|