|
|
Posted by ninphan on 07/13/07 18:12
On Jul 11, 2:10 am, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
> "ninphan" <sjburk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1183638397.943560.104110@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jul 4, 6:17 pm, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
> >> > That is irritating as I like BD, but the facts are HDDVD is more stable
> >> > at this point in time.
>
> >> I agree with this conclusion.
>
> > Not surprising when you think Dolby Digital and 24-bit PCM are
> > indistinguishable from each other.
>
> I know more about this than you could learn in the rest of your life. Do
> you know anything about the psychophysiology of hearing? I do.
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Wheeeee - why don't you go and play with your sacred TOS back at the
HA forums then if you're so smart?
You don't know more than I do about Dolby Digital, you might think you
do, but you don't. A comment like that could only come from a smarmy
cunt who's so full of himself that it takes every ounce of strength to
get away from the mirror in the morning.
Come back when your self esteem is not so hurt. In the meantime I'm
sure you and Amir from Microsoft can keep listening to Blu-ray disc's
PCM tracks with your $15,000 headphones saying to yourself over and
over again "this is no better than Dolby Digital, this is no better
than Dolby Digital, this is no better than Dolby Digital."
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|