|
|
Posted by ninphan on 07/13/07 18:13
On Jul 11, 2:10 am, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
> "ninphan" <sjburk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1183638366.778465.179190@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 6:15 pm, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
> >> "ninphan" <sjburk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1183046093.740015.320760@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Jun 28, 10:51 am, skip <skip[@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >> "David B. Mathews" <dmathews9...@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> >> news:n8GdnaU1Vt-
> >> >> MWB7bnZ2dnUVZ_vein...@comcast.com:
>
> >> >> >http://snipr.com/1ngfd
>
> >> >> I use both Blu Ray and hd dvd on my 52 inch JVC.I will admit the
> >> >> picture
> >> >> is
> >> >> better than a normal DVD it is nothing to write home about.
>
> >> > I've written home about it several times.
> >> > Pirates of the Caribbean, Enter the Dragon, Donnie Brasco, Identity,
> >> > MI:3, Enemy of the State, Deja Vu, Open Season, The Prestige, Nine
> >> > Inch Nails - Beside you in Time, Planet Earth, World Trade Centre,
> >> > Casino Royale, Apocalypto, Kingdom of Heaven, Black Hawk Down - all
> >> > absolutely stunning and several times better than anything I've seen
> >> > on DVD whether upconverted or not.
> >> > Also the sound, particularly on Buena Vista's 24-bit PCM titles,
> >> > rounds circles around the lossy 448 Kbps Dolby Digital tracks found on
> >> > most DVD's.
>
> >> Nonsense....this has been scientifically analyzed and perceptually these
> >> are
> >> equivalent (when the compression is done right). The benefit of other
> >> techniques is that you do not need the expertise of a
> >> compressionist...you
> >> DO need a terrific sound crew in either case.
>
> >> The video is patently NOT several times better than upconverted DVD.
> >> That
> >> is hyperbole. The original poster is correct...it is a nice improvement,
> >> but nothing to write home about (ps...I have high end equipment).- Hide
> >> quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Sorry but you're talking bollocks.
> > Uncompressed 24-bit PCM is head over shoulders above compressed Dolby
> > Digital.
>
> Prove it with scientific listening tests...double blinded. It has been done
> and the answer is NO!
>
> > You could go between 24/48 PCM on POTC and Dolby Digital all day, with
> > all levels set to be the same SPL, and you'd pick the PCM track out
> > EVERY TIME. I
>
> Untrue.
>
> >t's that much of a difference. It doesn't matter how good
> > the compressionist is, you can't lose that much data (448 Kbps vs 6900
> > Kbps) and not notice it. All the analysis in the world means fuck all
> > when you sit down and use your own two ears....or anyone elses.
>
> > The picture quality between DVD and HD DVD/Blu-ray 1080p is also a
> > huge difference over DVD, upscaled or not.
>
> Not scientific wishful thinking.
>
> By the way, what is the upper range of human hearing...frequency and
> dynamic?? LOL 24 bit PCM ROTFL. Idiots.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the hero of compressed, lossy music
lovers everywhere.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|