|
|
Posted by Alpha on 01/15/06 09:09
"Alpha" <none@none.net> wrote in message
news:11sk3vp991bg084@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Allan" <Spamsucks@finallykantica22admitstobebrianlamb.org> wrote in
> message news:p3vjs151o2v4gcihce6r9r9lovff83lqna@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:08:16 GMT, "Joshua Zyber"
>> <jzyber@mind-NOSPAM-spring.com> wrote:
>>
>>>but it's another
>>>to be stubbornly ignorant.
>>
>> Count on 'Alpha' to "be stubbornly ignorant."
>>
>> Not so big on admitting when he was 100% wrong. Expect 'Alpha' to
>> completely ignore what he has said in the past.... especially when it
>> has been proven wrong.
>
>
> I will argue no further. I was and am not wrong on this. The problems
> they ran into are being covered up by political issues. That is all.
>
> There never was even the slightest indication of the merest prototype.
> Just hype from Samsung.
>
> As for Zyber, kiss my doctorate.
>
>
>
PS
Here is a quote from someone who knows something about the technical issue:
some kind of dual laser optical pickup that can cope withthe very different
layer depths and light wavelengths. - not impossible, but very complex,
especially since the OEM manufactures are probably only working with a
drive+optics of one format or the other, samsung would have to fund the R+D.
2) A unit with two drives in it, ie. two trays to eject and choose from
(very confusing for users to try both until the disc they bought works, but
for unit returns and customer returns)
3) a unit with two drives/optics but an "inverse" disc changer - i.e.
accepts one disc and moves it internally betweent he two drive heads/units.
???
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|