|
|
Posted by unclejr on 10/05/25 11:37
Joshua Zyber wrote:
> For what it's worth, the 1.78:1 re-framing was chosen by director Andrew
> Niccol.
That's weird. I wonder why he would want it "panned and scanned for
16x9 televisions"? I mean if many scenes were composed at 2.35:1, then
why would any director want it cropped at 1.78:1?
-Junior
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|