|
|
Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 10/30/07 01:08
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:57:15 GMT, Derek Janssen
<ejanss1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:57:52 -0700, "Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SACD is a completely different animal altogether, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>>In other words, dumbfuck, you are talking "Apples and Oranges".
>>>>
>>>>Yo, clod.
>>>>DTS (DVD) audio and SACD were competing "hi-res" audio cd formats. Here
>>>>is a article from '05 that might illuminate that black hole of a brain you
>>>>have taking up space in that mellon-sized head of yours.
>>>>
>>>>http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/34579/130868.html
>>>>
>>>>Can you hear me McFly? Anyone home?!?
>>>
>>>=====================================
>>>The competing "hi-res" audio fromats are DVD-Audio and SACD.
>>>=====================================
>>
>> Not are. WERE.
>>
>> And now BOTH are overshadowed by TrueHD, etc.
>
>No. There are no TrueHD CD's.
>
>This is a problem with reading posts too quickly in the hopes of
>responding to them.
>And nobody likes Angry People Who Are Wrong...They're just too silly.
True HD DVDs! dingledorf!
The data rate would not go on CDs, much less the size constraints.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|