Posted by Jack on 12/01/07 07:25

Steven Sullivan <ssully@panix.com> wrote in
news:fiphic$rn7$1@reader1.panix.com:

> 128WMA CBR via FairStars Audio Converter (shows as 129 kbps)
> http://www.badongo.com/file/5364159

Now it gets interesting: GoldWave shows that yours was encoded with WMA
9.1, whereas mine (below) is WMA 9.2.

http://www.badongo.com/file/5372700 (3:30 to 4:00 WMA)

There is a chance they muddled something between those versions. Something
that just doesn't like old Neil Young analog masters?

Jack

• Next in forum: MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (201)
• Prev in forum: Re: WMA gets taken Down By The River
• Thread view: Re: WMA gets taken Down By The River

[Reply to this message]