|
Posted by Black Locust on 09/05/05 07:18
In article <hlgmh118scmu3m6gice2os253j8k7343ek@4ax.com>,
Rich <none@none.com> wrote:
> I haven't seen this effect personally.
> Unlike VHS, DVD players as a group seem
> to respond in many different ways when confronted with disks with
> damage. Some will play through anything without many problems, others
> seem more susceptable to things like scratches and sleeks, etc.
This is what I was thinking. I've exclusively used Panasonic players
since I first started using DVDs(my first player was an A-101) and
they've always chugged through every rental I've thrown at them, with
ease. But then I hear stories of some other brands choking on little
finger print smudges the size of dimes. But then of course with VHS, you
had all kinds of other problems. Even the finest VCRs couldn't solve
problems like drop-outs, fucked up tracking, distortion, etc. that would
so often plague rental VHS... Both formats have their downsides as a
rental product, but my experience renting DVDs has still been the more
pleasant one.
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we." - George Dumbya Bush
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|