|
|
Posted by Ken Maltby on 05/21/07 16:14
"Ty Ford" <tyreeford@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:aNWdnSs9NZ_hPszbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...
> On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:11:30 -0400, Ken Maltby wrote
> (in article <fYadnTOhp8NZbM3bnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@giganews.com>):
>
>>
>> I think it would be OK if they could have a whole range of
>> cameras and formats that they may use as they see fit. Even
>> if that offends some of the purists and professional snobs
>> that post here.
>>
>> Luck;
>> Ken
>>
>>
>
> Ken,
>
> Can someone be a professional without being a snob, for you?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ty
>
> --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services
> Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com
> Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU
>
I certainly have no problem with professionals who are acting
professional, but looking down on consumers and the equipment
they may find useful, calling them "idiots" or worse, doesn't fit my
definition of professionalism. Taking the position that a camera
suited to "family vacations" should be disposable, and must be
looked at as unacceptable junk, because it doesn't match up to
an expensive "professional" camera, is snobbish in my opinion.
Not everyone can buy a camera as a depreciable capital expense.
There are plenty of pros that post here to aid and support, all
who come to this newsgroup, Frank and Gary Bettan are good
examples, you don't see them putting posters down because they
don't have a professional interest in video.
Luck;
Ken
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|